- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. NPASR (non-admin closure) Lourdes 03:27, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Mia Ikumi
- Mia Ikumi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Manga artist who authored on Licca-chan and illustrated on Tokyo Mew Mew. Although Koi Cupid was recently PROD'ed, is her article still worth keeping around? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep – As her one-shot Only One Wish may meet WP:BK #1 (see WP:ANIME/REQUEST#O) thereby just meeting WP:CREATIVE #3. – Allen4names (contributions) 04:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - At this time I am seeing more notability than nothing at all. If the article isn't sourced more then it can always be re-nominated by someone who sees it as an issue. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.