- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mars People
- Mars People (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This race of characters does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to
Metal Slug (series), where the description section is directly copied fromMartian. The remainder of the article is a WP:TRIVIA-style list of "homages". Nifboy (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Comment if deleted, redirect to Martian 70.51.9.124 (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. If deleted, it should then be redirected to Martian as a possible search term. Tavix (talk) 01:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing to meet our sourcing requirements in WP:N. I would not object to creating a redirect to Martian, but since this article's history is not remotely relevant there is no need to keep it. Create the redirect later. Randomran (talk) 01:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Original research does not pay. Let it be known of the deletion, then redirect later as suggested; so if it's reverted, we can go right to CSD. MuZemike (talk) 05:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nomination is thorough and complete. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.