- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Mark Imgrund
- Mark Imgrund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A personal bio. No sign that WP:GNG or any SNG is met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom for the article is written in an editorial manner as in LinkedIn. Moreover, no references are cited. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 06:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No evidence of individual notability per WP:FILMMAKER and, as has already been mentioned, Wikipedia is not Linkedin. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete we really need to speed up the turn around time on getting rid of Linkedin articles posted on Wikipedia. Film editors even of the biggest films are rarely notable. It is directors and sometimes producers who are notable, not people with less controlling interest in the film creation. I know this ends up with more articles on actors than filmmakers, but actors are more well known and more in the public eye. To justify an article on Imgrund we would need to have quality sources showing substantial, reliable source 3rd party coverage of him, which we lack.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.