- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Mahphara kamil Tahsin
- Mahphara kamil Tahsin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Current links are to poor-quality homevideos on YouTube. I was unable to find meaningful content in reliable sources and therefore believe that this singer fall short of our notability requirements. Pichpich (talk) 23:33, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note that the following was left on the talk page by @Tahsinheheheh:
- Rising starts should also get a chance to show their talents No one was born star Wiki should give her a chance Maybe in future she ll something
- Delete Wikipedia articles are for those who are notable, not to propel people to notability. Delete at this time. If she rises to notability later the article can be recreated.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A7. Doesn't contain a credible claim of significance. Thparkth (talk) 22:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Too soon for an article. Very few Google hits, all of them apparently social media. Like others have pointed out, Wikipedia is for people who are already notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Not significant now, maybe in the future they could pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.