- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 17:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
M S Banga
- M S Banga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced biography of a living person.. Can't BLPPROD. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 18:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 24. Snotbot t • c » 05:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Prior to IP edits on 14 December 2010, this article did have a batch of references. Hence presumably why it wouldn't have been caught in the Great BLP Purge. These references are still visible in this version and could be replaced in the current article version. That said, they are of the corporate appointment announcement type. But it would be bets to consider these relative to this AfD and if deemed sufficient for notability, they can be re-added? AllyD (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep On the basis of the presidential award now referenced in the article. AllyD (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- DQ (t) (e) 21:39, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per AllyD's rationale, and also per significant coverage in multiple reliable sources: [1][2][3]. Quasihuman | Talk 22:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Padma Bhushan recipients are notable without any iota of doubt. --Bhadani (talk) 14:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Nomination's basis has been nullified by the addition of sources to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.