- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
M. P. John
- M. P. John (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable scholar; fails WP:PROF StAnselm (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:V. With regards, AnupamTalk 08:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why does WP:V make you think we should keep the article? That the information is verifiable is not in doubt. What is in doubt is the notability. StAnselm (talk) 09:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- While Christians are a minority in India, there are a lot of them. Accordingly theri leading academics should have articles. He appears to have occupied notable positions. The article says little of his role as a Bible translator, only hinting at it, but that is also potentially notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course, leading academics should have articles, but surely we should still use the criteria in WP:PROF. Anything else would be quite patronising, to say the least. What notable positions do you think he occupied? StAnselm (talk) 23:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: being Translations Secretary for the Bible Society of India seems non-notable. The main claim to notability here seems to be the Rectorship of Serampore College (1964-1971) and the Principalship of Bishop's College, Kolkata (dates unclear). I'm not sure if heading a small theological college is notable. -- Radagast3 (talk) 09:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails notability. I can find no mentions of him in his principalship roles, nor can I find citations of his publications. -- Radagast3 (talk) 03:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.