- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lyle Center for Regenerative Studies
- Lyle Center for Regenerative Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Individual research & teaching center inside a single ordinary level academic department in an ordinary level university. No indication of particular importance, no external sources for notability, or any reason to think there might be: it does not even offer a doctorate, just a masters and an undergraduate major. The section of wildlife shows how little can be said about the actual center & its activities. DGG ( talk ) 18:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 22:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:ORG notability. - MrX 22:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep There is a compendium of third-party, reliable, and scholarly sources on the subject. Here's just a few:
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Amonix Solar Energy Systems Inc.
- Engineers without Borders USA
- Power From the Sun - W.B.Stine and R.W.Harrigan (John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1986)
- Mention on the International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
- Research paper from "The 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (2006)," Geneva, Switzerland
- and several others on Google Scholar. -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 15:44, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, the Lyle Center became carbon-neutral in 2010, spearheading an effort to make the entire Cal Poly Pomona campus carbon-neutral by 2030, and received praised by then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger who said: "...I applaud Cal Poly Pomona and Amonix for their commitment to renewable solar energy generation. It is great partnerships like this one between a California-based company and a world-renowned university that will keep California a leader in this booming industry." (Reuters). -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 15:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ...we probably need to add WP:ITSGREEN to WP:ATA. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, the Lyle Center became carbon-neutral in 2010, spearheading an effort to make the entire Cal Poly Pomona campus carbon-neutral by 2030, and received praised by then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger who said: "...I applaud Cal Poly Pomona and Amonix for their commitment to renewable solar energy generation. It is great partnerships like this one between a California-based company and a world-renowned university that will keep California a leader in this booming industry." (Reuters). -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk 15:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 08:06, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 05:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:ORG. LK (talk) 06:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:ORG. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable per both above. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.