- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Living theory approach
- Living theory approach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Basically a promotional article pushing for someone's theory with random articles as refs. RedUser (talk) 01:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Ivecos (t) 17:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 06:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 06:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- comment This is unquestionably a real thing, as the merest GScholar search shows. Maybe some WP:TNT is in order. Mangoe (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. This isn't an encyclopedia article. It's more like an essay. Perhaps, as Mangoe suggests above, this is a real thing and we just need WP:TNT, but if that's the case, delete whatever we've got now and allow recreation of a better-written and sourced replacement. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.