- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Duplicate. Discussion continues at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of newspapers by establishment date (2nd nomination). Colonel Warden (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of newspapers by establishment date
AfDs for this article:
- List of newspapers by establishment date (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Keep: No sufficient reasons given. The topic is notable, the entries are well-sourced and the table structure is there for a massive expansion. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- keep although indeed not completely developed yet, I think this article is easily relevant and notable enough. Collaboration to develop articles from stub to better is what Wikipedia is all about. No valid deletion reason is given, so not sure why the nominator thinks this can be deleted within guideline. (PS note that the nominator has accidentily created both this first nomination AND the second nomination (see sidebox) at the same time. Arnoutf (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: The argument posed by the nominator for deletion (in the other nomination page) perhaps belongs in the WP:IDONTLIKEIT category, hence it is invalid as a reason to delete the article. Besides this, I can see no valid reason to delete the article, especially since it has just begun and has yet to be properly expanded.--Pericles of AthensTalk 23:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There appears to be two concurrent AfDs for this article. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of newspapers by establishment date (2nd nomination). ThemFromSpace 05:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.