- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of chiropractors
- List of chiropractors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unnecessary Fork of Historical figures in chiropractic Versageek 06:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not only an unnecessary fork, but an attempt to promote living and non-notable chiropractors by a new user who has even been blocked for his use of socks to keep it and another article going. Even when cleaned up it's an unnecessary duplication. Brangifer (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is just the tip of the iceberg. This editor needs to be reigned in. I have filed a report at ANI. Brangifer (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Brangifer. It seemed suspicious when I first looked at it (and removed a bunch of nn's), and categories should work in its place. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 19:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.