- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Environmental impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Courcelles 02:31, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
List of National Wildlife Refuges at risk from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
- List of National Wildlife Refuges at risk from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is a list that does not really add anything for the reader. I have just now split out Environmental impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill article and the contents of this page need only be a mention or even some ext links on that page. There is too much of a fixation on lists by WP editors. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. 05:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of US-related deletion discussions. 05:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Another minor detail, and the reference just lists the refuges without stating anywhere they are "at risk". Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the new article, which I agree seems like a better editorial presentation than a couple of lists. Note that this didn't necessarily need an AfD discussion unless it was contested. Jclemens (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge could be easily integrated into the new article. petrarchan47tc 22:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.