- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of Child Characters
- List of Child Characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No criteria for inclusion, no sources, no notability. See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Child Characters. BOVINEBOY2008 13:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Child Characters the criteria for this article is too broad and is likely to, based on the creators apparent criteria, expand to become an unmanageably large article of little value to the project. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete appears to have been created as a place to stick the equally faulty Child Characters template. Wildly indiscriminate and just plain silly, this could swell to hundreds of thousands on entries and still not be close to complete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Without an inclusion criteria i can only say, that this is just an indiscriminate collection of information. Armbrust Talk Contribs 14:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Cindy Brady and Casper the Friendly Ghost make this short, short list? Hmmm. Trivia. No concrete inclusion criteria. Open-ended list. Just about everything a Wikipedia list should not be in one package... SNOWBALLS would have a better chance... Carrite (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorize once some good criteria have been defined. Jclemens (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not another list. Eek. WP:NOTDIRECTORY --CompRhetoric (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Too broad a topic to justify an article; if this list had a thousand entries it would barely scratch the surface. The inclusion of redlinked entries doesn't help. Also, the criteria for inclusion are vague; note the inclusion of Cindy Brady, who eventually became an adult while portrayed by the same actress. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It would be a better idea to list characters for each show on that show's page, but an overarching list will get way too large to be of any user. Netalarmtalk 04:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete its my first list and I'm tried of my articles being Deleted--Gertie1999 (talk) 10:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.