- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
List of Australian Research Council religion journals
- List of Australian Research Council religion journals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable and per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. This is just a list of religion journals copied from an Excel file on the website of the Australian Research Council (ARC). The list is composed by the ARC, but the journals are further unconnected to the ARC (which does not seem to publish journals themselves). -- Crowsnest (talk) 07:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Crownest and per Talk:List of Australian Research Council religion journals#Copyvio?. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP is not a directory. The original list, assuming it's posted on the Internet, could be linked to Religion journal. Jaque Hammer (talk) 08:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per Talk:List of Australian Research Council religion journals#Copyvio?. The list cannot be linked to in Religion journal, because it is only part of a larger Excel file contining journals in all fields. (Do perhaps that would add to the AfD that this is a violation of no OR, too).--Crusio (talk) 08:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTDIR. LibStar (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.