- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kipling (VIVA)
- Kipling (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
These are all non-notable bus stops that fail WP:GNG. A large number of similar VIVA stations were deleted at this AfD. Slon02 (talk) 22:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following related VIVA stations for this reason:
- Islington (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Martin Grove (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Pine Valley (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Ansley Grove (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Weston (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Interchange Way (VIVA) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Oh yes! Thank you for cleaning out the remainder. I have contributed to some of these articles, and they are only fancy bus stops. If you have never stood at one of these bus stops, do not try and preserve them. To the nominator - please make sure everything is gone, because I don't want to do this over and over again. Check the navbox. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:25, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't see any reason that these bus stops would be notable, and I don't think there's anything worth merging that isn't expressed using File:Viva York Region route map.svg. If these get deleted, we should also do something about Template:VIVA Stations, as the resulting redlinks would encourage people to recreate the articles. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 23:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How about Other Vivastations? Is that just a work around to avoid previously deleted articles or is it a valid article? I say delete it too. Get them all! Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That sounds reasonable enough to me - it might be best to wait until this AfD is over and then PROD it if the consensus here is to delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 01:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that Other Vivastations was originally meant to be a way to squeeze in articles about individual VIVAstations in a way that they wouldn't be deleted for notability concerns. I agree that, if the consensus in this AfD is to delete, that we should get rid of that article as well. --Slon02 (talk) 17:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That sounds reasonable enough to me - it might be best to wait until this AfD is over and then PROD it if the consensus here is to delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 01:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How about Other Vivastations? Is that just a work around to avoid previously deleted articles or is it a valid article? I say delete it too. Get them all! Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All - These aren't major transit terminals. They are bus stops. Literally just a bus stop with a bus shelter. Google Streetview has a good view of the Kipling stop. -- Whpq (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clearly non-notable.--EdwardZhao (talk) 18:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.