- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No indication that this article passes the requirements at WP:GNG has been presented by those asking for the article's inclusion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Keishinkan
- Keishinkan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable martial art. No indication of notability and no independent coverage at all.Mdtemp (talk) 19:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 23:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 23:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Deletea non notable martial arts with no third person sources. I totally agree with the nominator. Dwanyewest (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- keep by WP:GNG.24.103.234.74 (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.