- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 12:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Katherine Wentworth
- Katherine Wentworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Character is not notable, article is bad and has not been improved for a long time, tags requesting citations and concerns for the article's notability are long-standing. Kavidun (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 27. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 20:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 20:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Just because an article's been tagged for years doesn't necessarily mean it should be deleted, If anything the article needs improving. –Davey2010Talk 22:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.