- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. apparent consensus. I urge Icewhiz to continue to work on the article DGG ( talk ) 09:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 18:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Kamran Farid
- Kamran Farid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
apparently doesn't pass WP:GNG. cited sources are not independent and reliable. clearly an autobio. Saqib (talk) 05:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep but remove the "Philanthropy" and "Controversy" sections. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- why keep ? please provide reason. --Saqib (talk) 07:21, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- The article has way too much detail on these things. Co-founding a $500 million company is notable. Being a party to non-notable lawsuits is not. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Remove "Philanthropy" (or reduce - which I just did), but most definitely keep lawsuits - which is why he is notable. the "edible arrangements" by itself doesn't make him notable (though it is an interesting business and did get some coverage). His serial lawsuits (and coverage of) alleging discrimination against himself, Muslims, and Islamic institutions - quite a collection of cases - push him over the notability line. Convinced by going over Google news hits.Icewhiz (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.