- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 13:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kahn Souphanousinphone
- Kahn Souphanousinphone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of King of the Hill through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in List of characters in King of the Hill is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Did TTN get bored today? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Weak keep Major character in notable show, and there's already some sourcing. That's enough reason. DGG (talk) 04:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Dont really see any reason to get rid of him User:Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.23.198.60 (talk) 04:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Kahn Souphanousinphone - the one source currently in the article is pretty trivial, and I do not believe that this character has enough real-world notability to be worth having a standalone article for him. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.