- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jac Vanek
- Jac Vanek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing in this article suggests this person is in the least bit notable. There are no reliable sources to confirm any of it or establish any kind of notability. I42 (talk) 06:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Apparently her only claims for notability are being the ex-girlfriend of a musician and a LiveJournal presence (which doesn't make a person notable otherwise there'd be an article about my friend Puggs). Her work as a model is - according to the article itself - "self-proclaimed", and as a photographer she is not the author of any work of relevance. McMarcoP (talk) 08:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the first comment here is inaccurate, as she is known for her bracelets and photography. However, there isn't sufficient reliable source coverage (that I could find anyway) to establish notability. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'd say that if she is known, as you say, it means that she might meet the notability guidelines. However, I couldn't find any reference to her work... McMarcoP (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Being known, and being notable aren't the same thing. 77K GHITS is a pretty good indication she is known, but doesn't establish notability. There is 1 news story about her, but it is of questionable quality and you need at least 2 RS anyway. All of this is the reason I declined speedy deletion, but not enough to establish notability. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'd say that if she is known, as you say, it means that she might meet the notability guidelines. However, I couldn't find any reference to her work... McMarcoP (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is a possibility that she is notable. But this article fails to establish it with any credible cites, and a quick Google does nothing to dispel what I suspected from the start; small time designer and pop band hanger on. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with User:ThaddeusB, who said it better and found a source that I did not; we both encouraged the article's creator to provide whatever reliable sources were available but nothing was forthcoming, and my brief search revealed nothing to corroborate any assertion of notability. As always, there is no bar to another article should notability accrue and be demonstrable. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:31, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.