- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 01:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
InfoBeans
- InfoBeans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a promotional page for a private company whose Notability can't be established. The article doesn't cite any third-party sources. Sckolar (talk) 11:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: A Highbeam search returns 18 results. Some are definitely no more than routine announcements but a couple quote representatives of the firm, one unsigned piece describing the firm as "one of the most renowned software companies at Indore" ([1], subscription reqd). These at least lift the article above CSD A7 territory, though I am not yet seeing anything that meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 16:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -Subject makes a genuine claim of WP:CORPDEPTH but unfortunately doesn't appear to be meeting the standard at this time. WP:INDAFD -sources, HighBeam. If there are more sources that I missed, please {{ping}} me, I'll be happy to change my !vote. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 11:27, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 11:27, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: As per my previous comment above, a company going about its business, but evidence lacking that it is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 12:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.