- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Home of the Bold
- Home of the Bold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability. Seems to be a minor game, google returns ~2000 hits for "Home of the Bold" game. Unencylopedic, and seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (web). Prodego talk 05:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Absolutely no context for game itself, and no assertion of notablility whatsoever. Nothing indicating widespread acclaim. Robert Skyhawk So sue me! (You'll lose) 01:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Seems to have enough notability to be worth including somewhere. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Their references include a book they publish themselves which isn't mentioned anywhere other than their sites. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%223D+Programme+Book%22&btnG=Search It also includes a news article from the same website that sells it and this book. Is there any reference outside itself? Shouldn't one of the major game review sites have at least some mention of it? A site that doesn't just review every single thing by a certain company that sponsors it, or lets anyone load up their own review to anything at all. Dream Focus (talk) 09:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.