- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy speedily deleted as G11. (non-admin closure) Pcap ping 01:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hiren's BootCD
AfDs for this article:
- Hiren's BootCD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources, and unlikely to be product reviews given that it illegally redistributes commercial software. John Vandenberg (chat) 11:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Commence mashing of delete button Blatant promotion of illegal activity. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 14:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - See my previous nomination for deletion. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 15:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like G11 to me. Tagged as such. No usable sources in google books or news. The previous AfD was closed as "keep" purely on WP:ILIKEIT grounds. The closing admin should probably be desysoped for that. Pcap ping 17:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original AFD nominator. I always thought the closure of the previous AFD was questionable, though I don't think one questionable closure is grounds for recalling an admin. ;-) //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 18:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.