- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Heimishe Kretchme
- Heimishe Kretchme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable website with COI, comes off like an advertisement. Lots of POV abound. An example of how the article works: the citation for visitor reaction is this Facebook posting. 90% of the references are from the forum itself or related blogs and similar materials. CyberGhostface (talk) 03:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lacks notability. Pyrrhus16 15:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of third-party reliable sources to justify notability. I noticed that couple of editors, include an admin, tried to help the creator by informing him/her with necessary policies/guidelines and userfying the page. But as it stands, I doubt that the subject is in fact notable. I think the closing administrator should take this fact in consideration and consider informing the user why exactly the article was deleted. LeaveSleaves 12:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.