- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Hentai companies. Spartaz Humbug! 05:07, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Green Bunny
AfDs for this article:
- Green Bunny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. No relevant ghits on Books, Scholar Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. Not sure that a Porn animation studio is likely to get hits on Google Scholar, no matter how notable it is. That said, they seem to have a relatively substantial collection of notable films. A quick search revealed La Blue Girl. Arisa, A Kite. I think notability would be possible to establish if I spoke Japanese, and knew what reliable sources wrote stories about Anime Porn. Which I don't, so that's why I'm going weak here. -Addionne (talk) 20:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 21:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete- Not enough coverage to satisfy WP:N. – Allen for IPv6 17:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Merge to List of hentai companies or List of hentai anime companies. (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Pineapple (2nd nomination)) – Allen for IPv6 14:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per S Marshall. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A studio is notable if some of its works are notable. Dream Focus 07:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a reference for that? "not every manufacturer of a notable product is itself notable" Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't just one product a company made, but a company with a list of notable products. Dream Focus 12:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The principle is the same. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't just one product a company made, but a company with a list of notable products. Dream Focus 12:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of hentai companies or List of hentai anime companies, per Allen4names (See also my opinion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Pineapple (2nd nomination), notability should first be established by sources)Folken de Fanel (talk) 09:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I renamed it List of titles by Green Bunny since it is and always has been a list article. There isn't but a sentence about the company, the article just listing its titles. Checked the article from the beginning of its history, it starting off this way even. It meets all requirements for a list article. Dream Focus 20:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — Dream Focus 20:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even for a list, the main topic must demonstrate that it meets the inclusion guidelines. In this case, the company itself must show that it is notable. And even then, a list of all of their release will violate WP:NOTCATALOG. —Farix (t | c) 23:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.