- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Gary Humphrys
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gary Humphrys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. 3 non indepth gnews hits. Article relies on primary sources to confirm he held positions. LibStar (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I could not see how the subject passes WP:GNG. Cabrils (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Gusfriend (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. scope_creepTalk 11:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not enough news coverage. Caphadouk (talk) 01:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete cannot find anything to support notability. I was going to suggest a redirect to Commission of Inquiry into the 2010–2011 Queensland floods, given the "critical" claim in the article, but the subject seems to not even get a passing mention in the 650+ page report on the matter, so that is potentially dubious. Aoziwe (talk) 11:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.