- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect due to incoming links and plausible search term. W.marsh 21:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
GameSpot's Best and Worst of the Year Winners
- GameSpot's Best and Worst of the Year Winners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article [1] is essentially a data dump of information from GameSpot. The awards themselves are barely notable. --- RockMFR 01:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete These awards can be merged into the respective video games, but this is just a list that should remain on GameSpot. the_undertow talk 02:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prune. Actually, I guess I should just do that now.... --Stratadrake 03:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Merge to GameSpot. In its newly stubbed form there isn't much worth saving, but it's a sub-topic of GameSpot.com so it should be mentioned there. --Stratadrake 03:22, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It doesn't even mention the winners.....I'd expect that AT LEAST. G1ggy Talk - Chalk 10:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I agree. It should be merged with Gamespot. Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 14:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Stratadrake. Realkyhick 16:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with the above users; this should stick to GameSpot. Why is it that video games are so susceptible to cruft anyway? Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 17:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yeah, why aren't the winners even there? The reason for all the useless video game stuff is because of fanboys who don't take an objective and reasonable approach to console gaming. Useight 20:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Because I was bold and pruned them (see prior revision). --Stratadrake 14:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete In agreement with the above. Acalamari 22:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Gamespot.--カラム 22:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closer - nothing in particular needs merged with the main article. The full list is certainly not wanted, and a brief description of the awards is already in the article. --- RockMFR 03:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As many have mentioned above the articles doesn't even contain the winner's of the award. This makes the article useless and unneeded on Wikipedia. Xtreme racer 03:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.