- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
GBG MMA
- GBG MMA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article with no independent sources about an MMA team whose members apparently have not won any championships in even second tier promotions (see WP:MMANOT). Even if they had, notability is not inherited and my search turned up no significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 01:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I believe this organization fails WP:MMANOT. Kevlar (talk) 03:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 01:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom - purely local.Peter Rehse (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom.
- Delete no evidence of in depth coverage in independent sources. If the article is substantially improved, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.