- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Cúchullain t/c 01:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Future Disney Cabinet
- Future Disney Cabinet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No assertion of notability (WP:N), no independent references (WP:V). Was up for prod on 5th October 2006. Prod reason was: Do not see that this meets any of WP:WEB, WP:ORG or WP:V if the greatest recognition achieved was to be "featured in a small column in Newsweek around January 1994". Prod was contested with the following reason: many other such fan organizations and MU* games are covered by Wikipedia, and FDC/TDC are still known in Disney fandom. Firstly, Inclusion is not an indicator of notability. Secondly, 'being known in fandom' is not a claim to notability. Marasmusine 09:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 09:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - No sources means the article is unverifiable (not that any notability is asserted} means the article must be deleted per wikipedia policy. Only excuse for keeping appears to be WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. DarkSaber2k 09:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Looks like original research and not verifiable. Of the few Google hits, none are reliable sources. Wickethewok 04:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.