- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SpinningSpark 02:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Favorite Chicken
- Favorite Chicken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I proposed this for deletion having not spotted that it had been proposed before, so wasn't eligible. My deletion rationale was (and is) "This has been here for 6 years with no references, and no indication that there has been significant coverage in reliable sources sufficient to meet our notability requirements. I would suggest that this is because the coverage doesn't exist; I certainly never found any." Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:13, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NCORP. I've lived in the UK for almost all of my life and have never heard of this. Failed to turn anything up in text searches (although a Google image search at least verifies that the franchises exist). However, I do accept that the rather generic name does complicate the search for sources. Created by what's probably an WP:SPA. -- Trevj (talk) 09:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 06:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no significant coverage about this chain. I tried a variety of search constructs to narrow results. This may have filtered away too much so I'm very open to reviewing any sources that anybody can dredge up. -- Whpq (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.