- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Ewelina Lisowska. ‑Scottywong| gossip _ 00:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ewelina Lisowska's Discography
- Ewelina Lisowska's Discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article about a (self-published recordings?) discography. Provides no further context beyond a mere listing of titles. Fails notability per WP:NALBUMS. - MrX 22:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Ewelina Lisowska without prejudice to deleting that article if being a polish xfactor semifinalist is the full extent of her fame ---- nonsense ferret 02:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 19:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Artist and albums do not meet WP:NALBUM. The article has plenty of space, discography pages are supposed to be a sub-article if too long. I agree that the main artist article is in strong contention for XfD, but that's for another time and not the focus of this AfD. Mkdwtalk 18:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.