- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Szczecin#Name and etymology. Sandstein 06:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Etymology of Szczecin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Etymology of Szczecin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Since this one was moving back and forth to redirect and full-text article, let us determine whether it can exist as a standalone. I was first sceptical, but I see there are other articles like e.g. Etymology of Aberdeen. I will be happy to hear other opinions. Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 July 12. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Nominator comments: while I was filing in the Twinkle nomination another user reverted the article back to redirect. I nominated this page for speedy deletion, but after the first user commented this was not any more possible. This is why the nomination is an AfD and the target is a redirect. Sorry for this mess. Please note that we are still discussing the article, this is not at all my intention to delete the redirect.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC) UPD: Reverted to the article, it has now template and it is easier to discuss--Ymblanter (talk) 10:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – I believe the Redirect is appropriate in that the “Etymology” is already covered nicely in the main article. If the section grows or becomes unwieldy it can always be broken out at that time. ShoesssS Talk 14:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect is already what happens here, I think this is appropriate. Vorbee (talk) 14:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Existing redirect is fine. — JFG talk 11:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect per above Seraphim System (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.