- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence
- Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article about an non-notable album (WP:NALBUM by a non-notable musician/band WP:BAND with nothing proffered to indicate its worthiness to stay. --ColonelHenry (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep notable release from a notable label with notable coverage BusyWikipedian (talk) 08:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 16:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nominator's reasoning. Hierophant443 (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Metropolis Records is currently the most commercially successful label in the genre, and many of these artists are notable enough for their own articles, not to mention these compilations are a series, it's not like the label did a one-off release 184.153.128.133 (talk) 18:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.