- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. SKCRIT#1: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) buidhe 17:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Discogobio dienbieni
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Discogobio dienbieni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia Elijahandskip (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 16:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, obviously. WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES, overwhelming and ongoing consensus for notability of individual species, tens of thousands of equivalent species stubs present. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Species should be preserved. Violation of WP:Before. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:Speedy keep#1 as no comprehensible reason has been given for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.