- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Disapainted
- Disapainted (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this web service is notable. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 18:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. If Ahecht's word "notable" is referring to Wikipedia:Notability, yes, he is right. Fleet Command (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. If every Pivot clone had it's own page then we'd have about 15 extra pages just like this, maybe there should be a 'clones' section on Pivot's page. Sunomi64 (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.