- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
D'Lumotec Oval
AfDs for this article:
- D'Lumotec Oval (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence or assertion of Notability over 2+ years' time; article appears to do nothing but promote a particular commercial product in violation of NOTCATALOG and SOAP.—Scheinwerfermann T·C02:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @133 · 02:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article doesn't hint at how this product has been discussed significantly, and it has no hits on google news search. It also reads like advertising. ThemFromSpace 02:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. For obvious reasons, and no notability. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spamalicious. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.