- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Collectors Club
- Collectors Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable per WP:BAND, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Gurt Posh (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:BAND, even if the statements currently in the article are accurate and can be acceptably sourced. Richwales (talk · contribs) 06:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Of the 5 references currently listed in the article, the first is major. The band was featured on BBC MUSIC SHOWCASE and even if you think that doesn't satisfy point 12 of WP:BAND, it can certainly be considered substantial coverage by a reliable source. The references from Gazette Live, Generator do not constitute significant coverage and can't be used to establish notability. The Red Hot Velvet article seems somewhat substantial but I don't feel that Red Hot Velvet is a reliable source. The Whitby Gazette article is certainly substantial coverage from a reliable source but I'm not sure that such a small news org should be used to establish notability. With such a common used phrase as a name, it's very difficult to find more references but I did find this which certainly can be used to establish notability. I also found this significant and independent coverage but I'm not sure how reliable the source is. Ultimately, I feel that the band satisfies point 12 of WP:BAND with their BBC feature and WP:GNG with the references I discussed above (the ones that I mentioned can be used to establish notability). OlYellerTalktome 21:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.