- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Coconino, Arizona
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Coconino, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. No evidence that this is or was a notable populated place. (Split from previous batch AfD) –dlthewave ☎ 16:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 16:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep Looks like the south rim of the Grand Canyon is in Coconino. Also Grand Canyon and Coconino National Forest in Coconino. waterfall. And here.Lightburst (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)- These links are referring to Coconino County, Arizona, not a town or address (the poster description has omitted "county"). The 1979 topo map (top middle) suggests it's another former siding on the Atchison-Topeka railroad: the Grand Canyon Railway. Unfortunately because Flagstaff's newspaper was the Coconino Sun and it's in Coconino County, I can't find any results about this siding. The next ones down the line are Apex, Arizona, Woodin, Arizona, Willaha, Arizona, and Valle, Arizona (which is an actual town on the highway a few miles from the railroad), but the ones after that (see this link for map) did not have articles made. These could be merged to Grand Canyon Railway. Reywas92Talk 21:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for that Reywas92. You are a careful researcher. I see that Coconino County, Arizona already exists and Coconino National Forest exists. The Coconino, Arizona in the nomination adds confussion. My !vote would be to Delete in order to avoid the confusion. Lightburst (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment since this shares its name with the name of the county, it's going to be very difficult to search for. SportingFlyer T·C 00:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This was once the terminus and later the penultimate stop before the Grand Canyon on the Grand Canyon Railway (see here). It is named after Coconino Canyon, which is in turn was named after the Havasupai who were known as the "Coconino" ("wood killers") by the Hopi, and this is how the county was named. We need more on these topics and this location, not a redirect to the railway article.([1], [2], [3] etc)----Pontificalibus 07:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Coconino, Arizona First nomination for deletion. Was a Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Pontificalibus. Does appear to be notable enough. -DJSasso (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep While finding sources is quite hard because the county has the same name, Pontificalibus shows good work here. This is another from a large batch of poorly BEFORE'd Arizona AfDs. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the sources found by Pontificalibus; despite the difficulty in finding them, they certainly seem to be out there. (Also, reducing confusion with similarly-named places isn't a valid reason to delete articles; by that logic, we should delete Los Angeles to avoid confusion with Los Angeles County.) TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.