- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 03:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Christina Mendez
- Christina Mendez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I was asked by an anonymous user to nominate this article for deletion on his/her behalf.[1] The anonymous user, 72.75.98.105, had previously placed a prod template on the article with the following rationale: Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria.[2] The prod was removed by another anonymous user. On the fate of the article, I choose to remain neutral. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 04:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Based on existing sources and my own google searches, this model does not seem to qualify under WP:ENTERTAINER notability guidelines. To be sure, perhaps better refs could be found during the AfD period, but the article should also assert her (adequate) notability. Thanks. HG | Talk 06:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pure vanispamcruftisement, IMHO ... a self-identified single-purpose account (Brenda Segna) has twice tried to bootstrap notability by adding external links to sites that are not notable enough to have Wikipedia articles (like Hispanic Support Organization and Venus Divas Plus Size Magazine), and replacing Wikilinks to other articles with external links to JPEG images and blogs ... one of the "references" (replacing the link to Lane Bryant) says that the subject is 116 years old! This subject lacks sufficient WP:RS to WP:V meeting WP:BIO criteria ... I have tried contacting the author and offered help on formatting references to match WP:MOS, but they have been unresponsive ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.98.105 (talk · contribs) 14:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not at all notable as a plus-size model or in any other capacity. KameraObscura (talk) 03:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.