- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Charlie (pornographic actress)
- Charlie (pornographic actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails PORNBIO and GNG. Even if sourced, her two awards in scene-related categories do not result in notability. Given her common name the searches could be quite difficult, but I found anything. Cavarrone (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Vacuous, unsourced piece. Clear GNG failure. Only "awards" are for group humping. Carrite (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Poorly sourced biography. I can't find any reliable source coverage to pass GNG. Fails PORNBIO with only scene-related awards. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 10:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relist rationale: The page's creator was never notified of this discussion. J04n(talk page) 10:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ...that is something not requested from our deletion discussion rules ([1], [2]) nor it is a valid argument for relisting a discussion for WP:RELIST. Cavarrone (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable; IMDB is not a proper source. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 13:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per just about all of the above. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. Reliable sources? Icarus of old (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Nom! BO | Talk 17:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For the same reasons identified above.Kabirat (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.