- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfy. Moved to User:Lavendercrayons/Carolyn's Hesburgh Project (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Carolyn's Hesburgh Project
AfDs for this article:
- Carolyn's Hesburgh Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prodded as apparent schoolwork that creates an alternate version of an existing article, Theodore Hesburgh. Deprodded with the following explanation: In response to the deletion: Yes, this is schoolwork. However, I am comparing the first and second revisions of a report I wrote for school. I did not copy the article on Theodore Hesburgh; I wrote about him. Please wait until Monday before deleting it. I think the author misunderstood the nature and purpose of Wikipedia. Delete or userfy. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy userfy. This is a simple misunderstanding -- let's not scare Carolyn away by deleting her school project. Pburka (talk) 01:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Before making this nomination, I gave the author some directives on how to deal with schoolwork. I trust that she saved it somewhere on her hard drive. In any case, she only wishes to have this article kept until Monday, and this AfD normally closes on Wednesday. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Userify - Per Carolyn. I'd lean towards straight speedy deletion, since Wikipedia is not the place to publish one's essays (one way or another we're now needlessly wasting some of our time on this), but OK, in the hope that we don't scare a potentially good contributor. §FreeRangeFrog 02:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (or userify). Clearly should have been a speedy delete candidate. tedder (talk) 02:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.