- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Business transformation management
- Business transformation management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was found to be copied from a web page, that is asserted to be freely licensed. Unfortunately, that page is now not reachable, nor can I find it elsewhere on their site. In any case, this is an unencyclopedic essay, written as a tutorial, . Based on the references, the term seems to be used only in a patent, and consultation reports based on it. I note the apparently related and wholly unsatisfactory article Business transformation. I have never found a good way of writing articles on business management concepts, but copying their jargon is not it. DGG ( talk ) 18:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if it was a widely used concept it would generate a lot of coverage. 4 gnews hits only. [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Step 3 of the AfD process was not completed properly. It has been fixed. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopedic, barely readable essay, annoyingly abstract and multiplying lists of buzzwords præter necessitatem in an attempt to lend false rigor, this is probably meant to promote a consulting business. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.