- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Bush (43) Era Republican Scandals
The result was Speedy delete. Alvestrand (talk) 20:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bush (43) Era Republican Scandals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete - Article is an indiscriminate collection of information; article has a non-neutral POV, and is a borderline attack article. Article was PROD'ed, and the article creator objected to the PROD. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ridiculously Strong Delete. I just deleted a duplicate nom that I made (apparently) right after you did. This is a purely negative POV fork. I think the title pretty much sums up the deletion reasons. Get rid of this crap. J.delanoygabsadds 18:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (G10) — I may not like the son of a bitch, but the tone and selective content clearly indicate BLP violations. MuZemike (talk) 18:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- An article on the scandals and controversy during the presidency of George W. Bush could probably written, and be kept NPOV. This, however, isn't it. Umbralcorax (talk) 18:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article Criticism of George W. Bush already exists, which covers any relavent information. Redundant article by a very unlikely search title. Theseeker4 (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G10 very soapy Attack page. Fails WP:NPOV with flying colors. Also, a similar, less POV, better sourced article already exists. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 18:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete an Admin really needs to Speedy Delete this article right now, he might have been one of the worst presidents we ever had, but it goes angainst WP:BLP, plus WP:CSD#10 is also effect here, also WP:NPOV, not to mention WP:SOAP, get this article out of here quickly. HairyPerry 19:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.