- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @180 · 03:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bulgaria–Malta relations
- Bulgaria–Malta relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
neither country has an embassy. a lack of third party coverage of actual bilateral relations mainly multilateral especially previous coverage of both being new entrants to EU [1], and a state visit in 2001 [2] does not make for 1 article. LibStar (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not likely to be notable any time soon. Preslav (talk) 09:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No actual notability about the relationship between the countries. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability asserted, implied, sourced, found, or likely. --BlueSquadronRaven 21:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No coverage secondary sources = fails WP:GNG = delete. QED. Yilloslime TC 19:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources discuss these relations. Fails WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I notice the rescue tag has again be placed on this with zero attempt to improve article. LibStar (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.