- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
British National Party election results
- British National Party election results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article does not cite any references or sources and Is a possible BLP violation. There are also no parallel articles for other political parties e.g. the Labour party or the Green party. Lucy-marie (talk) 10:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the same reasons as above I am nominating British National Front election results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for deletion.
- Weak Delete I have to agree. The articles in question don't seem particularily encyclopedic. The information should already be in the relevant election articles anyway. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't meant to be a reason for keeping or deleting but, at the moment I can't think of what criteria this breaks (I'm sure there is some). So I've got to go with WP:IAR until some other people way in. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since it is unsourced, and since this is a party which many people view negatively, I think it also raises WP:BLP concerns for those listed as candidates (as there is no way to verify that these were indeed the names of the candidates). Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.