- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 03:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Baton Rouge–Pierre Part combined statistical area
- Baton Rouge–Pierre Part combined statistical area (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Baton Rouge–Pierre Part combined statistical area no longer exists as Pierre Part micropolitan area was eliminated by US census bureau. AllisonFoley (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Just because it no longer exists does not not mean it should be deleted - the article just has to be edited to be in past tense. See WP:NTEMP. "Pepper" @ 21:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. "No longer exists" is not a valid deletion argument. --doncram 15:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) 00:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) 00:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Updated the article to reflect it being a former CSA. As an aside, does anybody know where to find when it ceased to exist? Because of Census Bureau data presentation changes I can't locate data between 2009 and 2014, so all I know is that it was eliminated sometime between those dates. A412 (Talk • C) 01:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NOTTEMPORARY. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC) - Keep: Still an acceptable article. SL93 (talk) 19:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.