- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Balagbag Araw
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Balagbag Araw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk) 10:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David.moreno72 11:11, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge to Calamba, Laguna or Laguna (province) - on its own, this article does not meet WP:GNG as there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - articles under WP:GEOLAND still have to meet WP:GNG - a search only turned up one reliable source, in a book called, "Neoliberalizing Spaces in the Philippines" by Arnisson Andre Ortega, but that was only a passing mention - all other search results were trivial - niether the Calamba, Laguna or Laguna (province) articles mention Balagbag Araw - Merge would be preferable, but if that is not possible, then, sadly, delete - Epinoia (talk) 02:29, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The single keep !vote here points to WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Balagbag Araw falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —seav (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.