- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Art Resilience movement
- Art Resilience movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. I find no pertinent, independent coverage of this in reliable sources. A Google search returns mostly results with punctuation, at least, between the two words "art" and "resilience", along with a couple of wiki articles, a couple of blog posts, and one event listing. It doesn't strike me that as an artistic movement it's achieved notability. The entire description of the movement is from the perspective of the participants' motivations behind it rather than in terms of any objective explanation of what it is. (Frankly, I'm not even certain that Ksenia Milicevic is notable, based on how little Google returns for her name, but I haven't run a full study on that.) —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Johnbod (talk) 02:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this currently suggests it's not independently notable yet, thus should not be kept as its own article yet. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Apart from some coverage in La Dépêche du Midi, a reliable source, no other sources seem to exist. Mduvekot (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.