- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 14:50, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Alzheimer Research Forum
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alzheimer Research Forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence provided of notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- At least two scientific articles: https://tools.wmflabs.org/scholia/topic/Q4492078 — fnielsen (talk) 08:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Besides the two sources listed on Scholia [1][2], there is this book [Alzheimer: 100 Years and Beyond] which discusses it in depth. Alzforum is heavily cited in the literature and hardly an article or book on Alzheimer does not mention it or cite it. SpinningSpark 21:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the article does have a lengthy bibliography, although I shall admit the bibliography does need tidying up somewhat. Vorbee (talk) 07:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep – Passes WP:GNG: [3], [4], [5]. North America1000 11:53, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.