- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Keilana|Parlez ici 22:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agentss
- Agentss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable band. Article more of a promotional tool than anything else, with band being labeled as having a "cult following", with nothing to back it all up with. Jmlk17 07:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, they appear to be somewhat notable with a few mentions in the music press ([1]), as well as having one of their videos on NME's website. Borderline, but maybe just enough. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Needs significant coverage, and a mention in a review of a various artists album isn't enough.--Michig (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The format and tone of this article suggests a copyright violation. Chubbles (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.