- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
9mm Jonson
- 9mm Jonson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article's subject matter is not notable. No info save the possible authors own site. WP:FAILN The article appears to be speculative. The citations were/are a red herring that failed to provide any information nor were germane regarding the subject matter discussed. The article looks good but fails because there is nothing to write about in the end in reality. Article should be deleted unless the claims can be substantiated. Even Jonson Arms site does not have info regarding the 9mm Jonson. The cartridge is a project that has been in the works for 25 years without being fruitful. It is likely a pet project by Jonson vis a vis Jonson Arms. Apart from Jonson Arms no one seems interested enough to discuss the topic or write about it.
Possible conflict of interest WP:COI
Possible sockpuppetry/meat puppetry
Please check Talk:7.62 Jonson regarding the latter two issues. DeusImperator (talk) 21:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yet another example of someone's personal project. Did a nice job on layout, but serious POV issues and nothing to establish notability, probably because there aren't any good sources. This and 6.5 Jonson and 7.62 Jonson are mostly cut-paste also. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 19:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. —AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.